On 15/12/2011 10:33, Kai Tietz wrote:
> -// { dg-options "-mno-align-double" { target i?86-*-cygwin* i?86-*-mingw* } }
> +// As for mingw target the the ms-bitfield switch is activated by default,
> +// make sure for this test that it is disabled.
> +// { dg-options "-mno-align-double -mno-ms-bitfields" { target
> i?86-*-cygwin* i
> ?86-*-mingw* } }
We don't use ms-bitfields on Cygwin, so I guess it wouldn't be expected to
do any harm anyway, but rather than setting the same options for both wouldn't
it be possible to do:
{ dg-options "-mno-align-double" { target i?86-*-cygwin* i?86-*-mingw* } }
{ dg-additional-options "-mno-ms-bitfields" { target i?86-*-mingw* } }
... so that MinGW gets both and Cygwin only the one it wants? (Actually the
first one could just as well be changed to dg-additional-options at the same
time, couldn't it?)
cheers,
DaveK
