On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hence, I in my opinion the comment should be:
> "! The compiler_options() function is dependent" …
>
> OK with that change, unless compiler_version() indeed
> makes a difference – but then I would like to understand why.
You're right, sorry for messing this up. Initially when I looked at it,
I didn't notice compiler_options() and just saw compiler_version() and
thought it behaved like -grecord-gcc-options which puts both version
and compiler options into DW_AT_producer.
It is indeed just compiler_options().
Jakub
