Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542113.html
On 3/16/20 6:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 3/16/20 3:41 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 11:39 -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/541521.html
I think Jakub indicated the test was incorrect. Please resolve that
issue and
repost. I think the core patch is OK, so we just need to fixup the test.
The test is correct as is, it just doesn't exercise the fix when there's
no <alloca.h> that defines alloca as a macro (i.e., in the case that
doesn't matter). It passes either way, but it doesn't pass with Jakub's
suggestion. I didn't look into why.
Anyway, attached is an updated patch with a modified test that does
exercise the fix regardless of whether or not the system does have
an alloca macro in its <alloca.h> header.
Martin
