When cp_unevaluated_operand is set, tsubst_decl thinks that if it sees a
PARM_DECL that isn't already in local_specializations, we're in a decltype
in a trailing return type or some such, and so we only want a substitution
for a single PARM_DECL.  In this case, we want the whole chain, so make sure
cp_unevaluated_operand is cleared.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to 8/9/10.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-03-14  Jason Merrill  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/93248
        * pt.c (build_deduction_guide): Clear cp_unevaluated_operand for
        substituting DECL_ARGUMENTS.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.c                                    | 5 ++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction71.C | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction71.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 789ccdbbbd1..0f3c2ad8fec 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -28071,10 +28071,13 @@ build_deduction_guide (tree type, tree ctor, tree 
outer_args, tsubst_flags_t com
                                     complain, ctor);
          if (fparms == error_mark_node)
            ok = false;
-         fargs = tsubst (fargs, tsubst_args, complain, ctor);
          if (ci)
            ci = tsubst_constraint_info (ci, tsubst_args, complain, ctor);
 
+         /* Parms are to have DECL_CHAIN tsubsted, which would be skipped if
+            cp_unevaluated_operand.  */
+         cp_evaluated ev;
+         fargs = tsubst (fargs, tsubst_args, complain, ctor);
          current_template_parms = save_parms;
        }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction71.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction71.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2fc71de8d95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction71.C
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// PR c++/93248
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+template <typename T> struct S
+{ template <typename V> S (T, V, long = 0); };
+using U = decltype(S{0, 4u});

base-commit: 53b28abf8e4ba37e47d3bb05476e0a80ae761567
-- 
2.18.1

Reply via email to