On 3/6/20 11:02 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 04:58:32PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
... the patch ;)
Paolo.
Fix "PR c++/94034 Broken diagnostic: 'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr"
A rather simple diagnostic issue where we failed to handle RESULT_DECL in
dump_expr.
Tested x86_64-linux.
/cp
PR c++/94034
* error.c (dump_expr): Handle RESULT_DECL like the other *_DECL.
/testsuite
PR c++/94034
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr94034.C: New.
LGTM. In fact, I had the same patch.
I think with this patch we print soemthing like "<result> <anonymous>"
which is still kind of ugly, but improving that is out of scope for GCC 10.
Hmm, is that really so much better?
Why do we end up trying to print a RESULT_DECL?
Jason
