On 12/13/2011 12:43 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
+      if (TREE_CODE (expr) == PTRMEM_CST)
+       /* We don't need to test if a PTRMEM_CST is a constant value
+          because maybe_constant_value might crash and because
+          [temp.arg.nontype]/1 says it's not allowed as a template
+          argument anyway.  */;

A PTRMEM_CST is already constant, and a valid template argument for a parameter of pointer to member type, we just want to leave it in that form rather than lower it to a CONSTRUCTOR.

Jason

Reply via email to