Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:55:53AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: >> > If/when it becomes necessary to have 'c' variants of functions, then a new >> > version of >> > the Vector Function ABI document will be created. And GLIBC and GCC >> > modifications to >> > comply with that new ABI will be made then. >> >> Though I'm usually uncomfortable with kicking the can down the road on these >> sorts of things, I can probably be convinced in this case. Tulio and I were >> wondering why the libmvec interface doesn't make use of ifunc capability for >> this sort of thing. Something to look into when more advanced >> implementations >> are added later, I guess, and a valid reason to not lock ourselves into the >> 'c' ABI today. > > Tulio, any concerns?
No. I agree to remove 'c' from the ABI now. Thanks! -- Tulio Magno
