On 2/21/20 6:48 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:28:42AM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/19/20 7:30 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:12:58AM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/13/20 8:56 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
My P0388R4 patch changed build_array_conv to create an identity
conversion at the start of the conversion chain.

Hmm, an identity conversion of {} suggests that it has a type, which it
doesn't in the language.  I'm not strongly against it, but what was the
reason for this change?

There are two reasons:
1) without it we couldn't get to the original expression at the start
of the conversion chain (saved in .u.expr), this is needed in compare_ics:
10660           tree n1 = nelts_initialized_by_list_init (t1);
10661           tree n2 = nelts_initialized_by_list_init (t2);
and nelts_initialized_by_list_init uses conv_get_original_expr for
arrays that have no dimensions.

Ah, ck_aggr and ck_list probably should have used u.expr like ck_identity
and ck_ambig....

2) struct conversion says
/* An implicit conversion sequence, in the sense of [over.best.ics].
     The first conversion to be performed is at the end of the chain.
     That conversion is always a cr_identity conversion.  */
and we were breaking that promise.

...or, if we're going to enforce this, ck_ambig will need to change as well.

And build_aggr_conv and build_complex_conv will need adjusting (one way or
another).

Changed my mind :-).  Turned out using u.expr for ck_aggr is a much smaller
change.  Moreover, that struct conversion talks about cr_identity, a rank,
not ck_identity.

ck_list uses u.list, so I'm not changing that.

-- >8 --
My P0388R4 patch changed build_array_conv to create an identity
conversion at the start of the conversion chain and now we crash
in convert_like_real:

  7457     case ck_identity:
  7458       if (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (expr))
  7459         {
  7460           int nelts = CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (expr);
  7461           if (nelts == 0)
  7462             expr = build_value_init (totype, complain);
  7463           else if (nelts == 1)
  7464             expr = CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (expr, 0)->value;
  7465           else
  7466             gcc_unreachable ();  // HERE
  7467         }

in a test like this

   int f (int const (&)[2])
   { return f({1, "M"}); }

Instead of creating a ck_identity at the start of the conversion chain,
so that conv_get_original_expr can be used with a ck_aggr, let's set
u.expr for a ck_aggr, and adjust next_conversion not to try to see
what's next in the chain if it gets a ck_aggr.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, built cmcstl2 and Boost, ok for
trunk?

OK.

2020-02-21  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/93712 - ICE with ill-formed array list-initialization.
        * call.c (next_conversion): Return NULL for ck_aggr.
        (build_aggr_conv): Set u.expr instead of u.next.
        (build_array_conv): Likewise.
        (build_complex_conv): Likewise.
        (conv_get_original_expr): Handle ck_aggr.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array11.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/call.c                                 | 17 +++++++++--------
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array11.C | 10 ++++++++++
  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array11.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.c b/gcc/cp/call.c
index f47f96bf1c2..84230b9ecb8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -117,13 +117,13 @@ struct conversion {
      /* The next conversion in the chain.  Since the conversions are
         arranged from outermost to innermost, the NEXT conversion will
         actually be performed before this conversion.  This variant is
-       used only when KIND is neither ck_identity, ck_ambig nor
+       used only when KIND is neither ck_identity, ck_aggr, ck_ambig nor
         ck_list.  Please use the next_conversion function instead
         of using this field directly.  */
      conversion *next;
      /* The expression at the beginning of the conversion chain.  This
-       variant is used only if KIND is ck_identity or ck_ambig.  You can
-       use conv_get_original_expr to get this expression.  */
+       variant is used only if KIND is ck_identity, ck_aggr, or ck_ambig.
+       You can use conv_get_original_expr to get this expression.  */
      tree expr;
      /* The array of conversions for an initializer_list, so this
         variant is used only when KIN D is ck_list.  */
@@ -861,7 +861,8 @@ next_conversion (conversion *conv)
    if (conv == NULL
        || conv->kind == ck_identity
        || conv->kind == ck_ambig
-      || conv->kind == ck_list)
+      || conv->kind == ck_list
+      || conv->kind == ck_aggr)
      return NULL;
    return conv->u.next;
  }
@@ -1030,7 +1031,7 @@ build_aggr_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags, 
tsubst_flags_t complain)
    c->rank = cr_exact;
    c->user_conv_p = true;
    c->check_narrowing = true;
-  c->u.next = NULL;
+  c->u.expr = ctor;
    return c;
  }
@@ -1083,7 +1084,7 @@ build_array_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
    c->rank = rank;
    c->user_conv_p = user;
    c->bad_p = bad;
-  c->u.next = build_identity_conv (TREE_TYPE (ctor), ctor);
+  c->u.expr = ctor;
    return c;
  }
@@ -1129,7 +1130,7 @@ build_complex_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags,
    c->rank = rank;
    c->user_conv_p = user;
    c->bad_p = bad;
-  c->u.next = NULL;
+  c->u.expr = ctor;
    return c;
  }
@@ -10498,7 +10499,7 @@ static tree
  conv_get_original_expr (conversion *c)
  {
    for (; c; c = next_conversion (c))
-    if (c->kind == ck_identity || c->kind == ck_ambig)
+    if (c->kind == ck_identity || c->kind == ck_ambig || c->kind == ck_aggr)
        return c->u.expr;
    return NULL_TREE;
  }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array11.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array11.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d3e58dea129
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/93712 - ICE with ill-formed array list-initialization.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+int f (const int (&)[2]);
+
+int g ()
+{
+  const int (&r)[2] = {1, "foo"}; // { dg-error "conversion" }
+  return f({1, "foo"}); // { dg-error "conversion" }
+}

base-commit: 8d1780b56d0cb1d50115d4e925e81cd8b9cb2923


Reply via email to