On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > Thank you, Mike, for your input. That is what v1 did, but it seems to > > > clash with some people's expectations, as discussed here: > > > > > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg00057.html> > > > > I didn't see any clash with expectations. They expect in the build tree > > testing to work, they expect install testing to work. I expect both, > > you expect both; I just don't think we differ on this. Where I think > > things went wrong is there is a change to their testing environment that > > you didn't fully account for in your patch. You didn't intend to break > > it, but there is just a little more work to be done to not break it, > > that's all.
FAOD the clash with expectations is in that you want a fix in `site.exp' while Chung-Lin wants one outside `site.exp'. The status quo does not clash with either of you, but it does not meet my requirements, though I don't care where the fix goes. I hope this makes things clear here. Maciej
