Hi Vladimir, This patch increases code size at -Os on arm-linux-gnueabihf by 1% (with no code-size reductions) on several SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks:
400.perlbench,perlbench_base.default ,580842,583842 429.mcf,mcf_base.default ,7867,7955 403.gcc,gcc_base.default ,1726449,1736149 433.milc,milc_base.default ,66328,66816 456.hmmer,hmmer_base.default ,148394,149434 482.sphinx3,sphinx_livepretend_base.default ,99183,99863 Could you look into whether these regressions can be avoided? Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 2, 2020, at 7:46 PM, Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > The previous patch for > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 > > resulted in aarch64 testsuite failures. > > The following patch solves some of the failures and modified the PR test as > the generated code changed. > > The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and benchmarked on SPEC2000. > > > <pr91333-2.patch>
