2011/12/12 Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>: > On 12/11/2011 09:00 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote: >> >> Here, we weren't creating a typename_type for a dependent type >> introduced by a using declaration. A USING_DECL was not recording the >> fact that it refers to a dependent type, so I've created a new macro >> USING_DECL_TYPENAME_P to record that information (using the free slot >> DECL_LANG_FLAG_1 for USING_DECLs), and set it appropriately in >> cp_parser_using_declaration. > > > I think we can do without this flag; if DECL_DEPENDENT_P and the target decl > is a TYPE_DECL, it's a typename.
I don't think so, if DECL_DEPENDENT_P is set, the target decl cannot be determined. -- Fabien
