On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:29:32AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:21 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:01 PM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:53 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:40 AM Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:22 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since nested function isn't only called directly, there is 
> > > > > > > ENDBR32 at
> > > > > > > function entry and we need to skip it for direct jump in 
> > > > > > > trampoline.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hm, I'm afraid I don't understand this comment. Can you perhaps 
> > > > > > rephrase it?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ix86_trampoline_init has
> > > > >
> > > > >      /* Compute offset from the end of the jmp to the target function.
> > > > >          In the case in which the trampoline stores the static chain 
> > > > > on
> > > > >          the stack, we need to skip the first insn which pushes the
> > > > >          (call-saved) register static chain; this push is 1 byte.  */
> > > > >       offset += 5;
> > > > >       disp = expand_binop (SImode, sub_optab, fnaddr,
> > > > >                            plus_constant (Pmode, XEXP (m_tramp, 0),
> > > > >                                           offset - (MEM_P (chain) ? 1 
> > > > > : 0)),
> > > > >                            NULL_RTX, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT);
> > > > >       emit_move_insn (mem, disp);
> > > > >
> > > > > Without CET, we got
> > > > >
> > > > > 0000011 <bar.1878>:
> > > > >   11: 56                    push   %esi
> > > > >   12: 55                    push   %ebp   <<<<<< trampoline jumps 
> > > > > here.
> > > > >   13: 89 e5                mov    %esp,%ebp
> > > > >   15: 83 ec 08              sub    $0x8,%esp
> > > > >
> > > > > With CET, if bar isn't only called directly, we got
> > > > >
> > > > > 00000015 <bar.1878>:
> > > > >   15: f3 0f 1e fb          endbr32
> > > > >   19: 56                    push   %esi
> > > > >   1a: 55                    push   %ebp   <<<<<<<< trampoline jumps 
> > > > > here.
> > > > >   1b: 89 e5                mov    %esp,%ebp
> > > > >   1d: 83 ec 08              sub    $0x8,%esp
> > > > >
> > > > > We need to add 4 bytes for trampoline to skip endbr32.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the updated patch to check if nested function isn't only
> > > > > called directly,
> > > >
> > > > Please figure out the final patch. I don't want to waste my time
> > > > reviewing different version every half hour. Ping me in a couple of
> > > > days.
> > >
> > > This is the final version:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg00586.html
> > >
> > > You can try the testcase in the patch on any machine with CET binutils
> > > since ENDBR32 is nop on none-CET machines.  Without this patch,
> > > the test will fail.
> >
> > Please rephrase the comment. I don't understand what it tries to say.
> >
>
> Here is the patch with updated comments.  OK for master and 8/9 branches?
>
> Thanks.
>
> H.J.
> ---
> Since pass_insert_endbranch inserts ENDBR32 at entry of the target
> function if it may be called indirectly, we also need to skip the
> 4-byte ENDBR32 for direct jump in trampoline if it is the case.

"
Skip ENDBR32 at the entry if called indirectly.
"
pass_insert_endbranch inserts ENDBR at the entry of the target
function.  We need to skip
>
> Tested on Linux/x86-64 CET machine with and without -m32.
>
> gcc/
>
>         PR target/93656
>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_trampoline_init): Skip ENDBR32 at
>         the target function entry.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
>         PR target/93656
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr93656.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.c                  | 9 ++++++++-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93656.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93656.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index 44bc0e0176a..52640b74cc8 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -16839,9 +16839,16 @@ ix86_trampoline_init (rtx m_tramp, tree fndecl, rtx 
> chain_value)
>          the stack, we need to skip the first insn which pushes the
>          (call-saved) register static chain; this push is 1 byte.  */
>        offset += 5;
> +      int skip = MEM_P (chain) ? 1 : 0;

offset += 5 - MEM_P (chain) ? 1: 0;

> +      /* Since pass_insert_endbranch inserts ENDBR32 at entry of the
> +        target function if it may be called indirectly, we also need
> +        to skip the 4-byte ENDBR32 if it is the case.  */

/* Skip ENDBR32 at the entry of the target function when called indirectly.  */

> +      if (need_endbr
> +         && !cgraph_node::get (fndecl)->only_called_directly_p ())
> +       skip += 4;

offset += 4;

>        disp = expand_binop (SImode, sub_optab, fnaddr,
>                            plus_constant (Pmode, XEXP (m_tramp, 0),
> -                                         offset - (MEM_P (chain) ? 1 : 0)),
> +                                         offset - skip),

plus_constant (Pmode, XEXP (m_tramp, 0), offset),

Uros.

>                            NULL_RTX, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT);
>        emit_move_insn (mem, disp);
>      }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93656.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93656.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f0ac8c8edaa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93656.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +/* { dg-do run { target { ia32 && cet } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fcf-protection" } */
> +
> +#include "pr67770.c"
> --
> 2.24.1
>

Reply via email to