On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 08:11 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:27:29PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > PR analyzer/93212
> > * g++.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp: New subdirectory and .exp
> > suite.
> > * g++.dg/analyzer/malloc.C: New test.
> > * g++.dg/analyzer/pr93212.C: New test.
>
> The test FAILs with c++11:
> .../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/analyzer/pr93212.C:4:1: error: 'lol'
> function uses 'auto' type specifier without trailing return type
> .../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/analyzer/pr93212.C:4:1: note: deduced return
> type only available with '-std=c++14' or '-std=gnu++14'
>
> Fixed thusly, regtested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk as
> obvious.
Thanks Jakub, and sorry for the failure.
I did some digging into why this got through my testing.
My standard patch testing involves a bootstrap build with these three
Makefile targets in sequence:
make all
make install
make check
each teed to a logfile, and with a suitable -j
I hadn't noticed the check-c++-all in cp/Make-lang.in.
I've been using "--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\}" in my RUNTESTFLAGS
during development of a patch, but I notice now that I didn't have it
in my bootstrap testing. I've fixed that, and added check-c++-all.
Are there any other Makefile targets I should be testing with?
Thanks
Dave
