On 12/12/2011 09:03 AM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hmpf, I would have simply committed without a re-approval, but if you > think it's necessary I'll wait.
The revised patch is ok too. r~
On 12/12/2011 09:03 AM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hmpf, I would have simply committed without a re-approval, but if you > think it's necessary I'll wait.
The revised patch is ok too. r~