On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 09:43:30AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Aha, there the problem was hidden! — I assumed something in the tree went
> wrong, but didn't spot where.
>
> Does this also fix PR 92844?
The full diff of test_summary for libgomp on powerpc64le-linux is:
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
-FAIL: libgomp.fortran/use_device_addr-1.f90 -O0 execution test
-FAIL: libgomp.fortran/use_device_addr-2.f90 -O0 execution test
=== libgomp Summary ===
-# of expected passes 7481
-# of unexpected failures 2
+# of expected passes 7483
# of expected failures 2
# of unsupported tests 493
=== libitm tests ===
so I don't think use_device_ptr-optional-2 is FAILing, at least not for me.
Jakub
