For the 2s failures in the PR, we have a V4SF VEC_PERM_EXPR in
which the first two elements are duplicates of one element and
the other two are don't-care:

    v4sf_b = VEC_PERM_EXPR <v4sf_a, v4sf_a, { 1, 1, ?, ? }>;

The heuristic was to extend this with a blend:

    v4sf_b = VEC_PERM_EXPR <v4sf_a, v4sf_a, { 1, 1, 2, 3 }>;

but it seems better to extend a partial duplicate to a full duplicate:

    v4sf_b = VEC_PERM_EXPR <v4sf_a, v4sf_a, { 1, 1, 1, 1 }>;

Obviously this is still just a heuristic though.

I wondered whether to restrict this to two elements or more
but couldn't find any examples in which it made a difference.
Either way should be fine for the purposes of fixing this PR.

Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu.  Richard mentioned
in the PR that he had a different fix in mind, but since I'd tested
this overnight, I thought I might as well post it anyway as a possible
belt-and-braces fix.  OK to install?

Richard


2020-01-27  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@arm.com>

gcc/
        PR tree-optimization/92822
        * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_vector_constructor): When filling
        out the don't-care elements of a vector whose significant elements
        are duplicates, make the don't-care elements duplicates too.
---
 gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
index d63e87c8a5b..5203891950a 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
@@ -2455,16 +2455,26 @@ simplify_vector_constructor (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
         it and its source indexes to make the permutation supported.
         For now it mimics a blend.  */
       vec_perm_builder sel (refnelts, refnelts, 1);
+      bool all_same_p = true;
       for (i = 0; i < elts.length (); ++i)
-       sel.quick_push (elts[i].second + elts[i].first * refnelts);
+       {
+         sel.quick_push (elts[i].second + elts[i].first * refnelts);
+         all_same_p &= known_eq (sel[i], sel[0]);
+       }
       /* And fill the tail with "something".  It's really don't care,
          and ideally we'd allow VEC_PERM to have a smaller destination
-        vector.  As heuristic try to preserve a uniform orig[0] which
-        facilitates later pattern-matching VEC_PERM_EXPR to a
-        BIT_INSERT_EXPR.  */
+        vector.  As a heuristic:
+
+        (a) if what we have so far duplicates a single element, make the
+            tail do the same
+
+        (b) otherwise preserve a uniform orig[0].  This facilitates
+            later pattern-matching of VEC_PERM_EXPR to a BIT_INSERT_EXPR.  */
       for (; i < refnelts; ++i)
-       sel.quick_push ((elts[0].second == 0 && elts[0].first == 0
-                        ? 0 : refnelts) + i);
+       sel.quick_push (all_same_p
+                       ? sel[0]
+                       : (elts[0].second == 0 && elts[0].first == 0
+                          ? 0 : refnelts) + i);
       vec_perm_indices indices (sel, orig[1] ? 2 : 1, refnelts);
       if (!can_vec_perm_const_p (TYPE_MODE (perm_type), indices))
        return false;

Reply via email to