On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:00:47PM +0400, Michael Zolotukhin wrote:
> The problem is that when vect_multiple_sizes is true, then no correct
> number exist (at least, theoretically). That's because number of
> diagnostic messages depends on number of available vector sizes - for
> now this number is usually 2 (on x86 it's 256 and 128 bit vectors), so
> we could change 'xfail' to 'target'. But when wider vectors become
> available (512 bit), there will be fails again.
Which is why introducing
vect_multiple_sizes_32B_16B (for -mno-prefer-128) and
vect_multiple_sizes_16B_32B (for -mprefer-128) and using it in the tests
could solve it.
Jakub
