On 1/22/20 3:31 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 22/01/20 17:27, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/22/20 10:22 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
in this simple issue we either wrongly talked about variable
template-id in c++17 mode or ICEd in c++2a. I think we simply want to
handle concept-ids first, both as represented in c++17 mode and as
represented in c++2a mode. Tested x86_64-linux.
What happens if you try to use a function template/function concept name?
AFAICS no ICEs, no regressions but indeed we can do better, tell
concepts from function templates. The below does that and passes testing
but I'm not sure if the wording is optimal, whether we always want to
talk about concept-id.
I think it's fine either way.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+// { dg-options "-w -fconcepts" }
Does it work to use -fconcepts-ts instead of -w -fconcepts?
Jason
