On 21/01/2020 19:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Not a review, just nitpicking.  Please avoid the backslash before >.
> The PR number should go to both gcc/ and gcc/testsuite/ ChangeLog
> entry and we don't have bug/ category; the bug is target category,
> so it should be PR target/93221, or could be reclassified first in
> bugzilla e.g. to middle-end and then written as PR middle-end/93221.
>
Done
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +/* PR bug/93221 */
> Likewise here.
Done
> Not sure if I understand why do you need optimize (0) attribute when the
> whole test is compiled with -O0.  Doesn't it ICE without the attribute
> too?
Done. It's not really necessary, belt and braces.

Updated patch attached

From 1a2980ef6eeb76dbf0556f806a85a4f49ad3ebdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Hutton <joel.hut...@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:37:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [IRA] Fix bug 93221 by reverting 11b8091fb

11b8091fb introduced a simplified LRA algorithm for -O0 that turned off
hard register splitting, this causes a problem for parameters passed in
multiple registers on aarch64. This fixes bug 93221.
---
 gcc/ira.c                                  | 38 +++++++++-------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93221.c | 10 ++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93221.c

diff --git a/gcc/ira.c b/gcc/ira.c
index 46091adf8109263c72343dccfe4913857b5c74ae..c8b5f869da121506f0414901271eae9810689316 100644
--- a/gcc/ira.c
+++ b/gcc/ira.c
@@ -5205,35 +5205,27 @@ ira (FILE *f)
   /* Perform target specific PIC register initialization.  */
   targetm.init_pic_reg ();
 
-  if (optimize)
-    {
-      ira_conflicts_p = true;
-
-      /* Determine the number of pseudos actually requiring coloring.  */
-      unsigned int num_used_regs = 0;
-      for (unsigned int i = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i < DF_REG_SIZE (df); i++)
-	if (DF_REG_DEF_COUNT (i) || DF_REG_USE_COUNT (i))
-	  num_used_regs++;
-
-      /* If there are too many pseudos and/or basic blocks (e.g. 10K
-	 pseudos and 10K blocks or 100K pseudos and 1K blocks), we will
-	 use simplified and faster algorithms in LRA.  */
-      lra_simple_p
-	= ira_use_lra_p
-	  && num_used_regs >= (1U << 26) / last_basic_block_for_fn (cfun);
-    }
-  else
-    {
-      ira_conflicts_p = false;
-      lra_simple_p = ira_use_lra_p;
-    }
+  ira_conflicts_p = optimize > 0;
+
+  /* Determine the number of pseudos actually requiring coloring.  */
+  unsigned int num_used_regs = 0;
+  for (unsigned int i = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i < DF_REG_SIZE (df); i++)
+    if (DF_REG_DEF_COUNT (i) || DF_REG_USE_COUNT (i))
+      num_used_regs++;
+
+  /* If there are too many pseudos and/or basic blocks (e.g. 10K
+     pseudos and 10K blocks or 100K pseudos and 1K blocks), we will
+     use simplified and faster algorithms in LRA.  */
+  lra_simple_p
+    = ira_use_lra_p
+      && num_used_regs >= (1U << 26) / last_basic_block_for_fn (cfun);
 
   if (lra_simple_p)
     {
       /* It permits to skip live range splitting in LRA.  */
       flag_caller_saves = false;
       /* There is no sense to do regional allocation when we use
-	 simplified LRA.  */
+	simplified LRA.  */
       flag_ira_region = IRA_REGION_ONE;
       ira_conflicts_p = false;
     }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93221.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93221.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4dc2c3d0149423dd3d666f7428277ffa9eb765c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93221.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* PR target/93221 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer" } */
+
+struct S { __Int32x4_t b[2]; };
+
+void
+foo (struct S x)
+{
+}
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to