On 12/10/2011 12:28 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > patch2: voidify_wrapper_expr wasn't handling MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR. The > patch adds a reasonable default handling that applies to this case (and > this way, we don't need to teach language-independent code about > MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR). > > patch3: As Jason pointed out, storing the noexcept specification in the > TRANSACTION_EXPR is less clean than just extending MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR > with support for a boolean condition. This patch does that, including > instantiation etc. > > patch4: This is the noexcept patch again. Nothing changed since last > time except it's now based on conditional MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR, which > simiplifies things. > > OK for trunk?
Ok. r~
