On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote: > Carrot Wei <car...@google.com> writes: >> Since it also affects 4.6 branch, can this and r176270 also be ported >> to gcc4.6? > > Always worth asking, but in this case, I'm not sure it's appropriate. > The patch is pretty invasive, and I don't think the bug is a regression. > > Also, 4.6 generates really lousy code for these intrinsics, so I think > anyone who's serious about using them would need 4.7 anyway. >
Sounds reasonable. thanks Carrot
