[Patch, fortran][9/10 Regression] PR 93236 -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

[Mark Eggleston]

Please find attached patch to fix this regression.

OK for master and 9 branch?

Change logs:

gcc/fortran

    Mark Eggleston  <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>

    PR fortran/93236
    * resolve.c (resolve_types): Declare boolean recursive and set with the
    value of the recursive attribute of namespace proc_name symbol
    structure if it exists.  Call gfc_save_all if both flag_automatic and
    recursive are false or ns->save_all is true.

gcc/testsuite

    Mark Eggleston  <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>
    Tobias Burnus  <bur...@gcc.gnu.org>

    * gfortran.dg/pr93263_1.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/pr93263_2.f90: New test.

--
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html


>From aefc0be25bc7ea1a216ac1950a856d5b654d5493 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Eggleston <markeggles...@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:08:11 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: PR93263 -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

The use of -fno-automatic should not affect the save attribute of a
recursive procedure. The first test case checks unsaved variables
and the second checks saved variables.
---
 gcc/fortran/resolve.c                   |  3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_1.f90 | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_2.f90 | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_1.f90
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_2.f90

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index 6f2a4c4d65a..bddab39d023 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
@@ -17079,6 +17079,7 @@ resolve_types (gfc_namespace *ns)
   gfc_data *d;
   gfc_equiv *eq;
   gfc_namespace* old_ns = gfc_current_ns;
+  bool recursive = ns->proc_name && ns->proc_name->attr.recursive;
 
   if (ns->types_resolved)
     return;
@@ -17132,7 +17133,7 @@ resolve_types (gfc_namespace *ns)
 
   gfc_traverse_ns (ns, resolve_values);
 
-  if (ns->save_all || !flag_automatic)
+  if (ns->save_all || (!flag_automatic && !recursive))
     gfc_save_all (ns);
 
   iter_stack = NULL;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_1.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f96b3589411
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_1.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-options "-fno-automatic -fdump-tree-original" }
+!
+! Test contributed by Mark Eggleston  <mark.eggles...@codethink.com>
+
+program main
+  implicit none
+  call check(2)
+end 
+
+recursive subroutine check(n)
+  implicit none
+  integer n, a
+  a = 10
+  print*,"n=",n
+  if (n==1) then
+    a=a-1
+    print*,"assigning a=",a
+  else
+    a=a-2
+    print*,"assigning a=",a
+    call check(n-1)
+  endif
+  print*,"a=",a
+end 
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "static integer\\(kind=4\\) a" "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "integer\\(kind=4\\) a" "original" } }
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_2.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_2.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fd353c6b548
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93263_2.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+!
+! Test contributed by Tobias Burnus  <bur...@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+  integer :: cnt
+  cnt = 0
+  call sub()
+  if (cnt /= 5) stop 1
+contains
+  recursive subroutine sub()
+    save
+    logical :: first = .true.
+    integer :: i
+    cnt = cnt + 1
+    if (first) then
+      first = .false.
+      i = 1
+    end if
+    print *, "Hello", i
+    i = i + 1
+    if (i <= 5) call sub()
+  end subroutine
+end
+
-- 
2.11.0