What about the previous patch fixing the existing testism by skipping
for big-endian arm using existing target supports?
On 07/01/2020 07:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Consequently whilst looking at the list I noticed these two were missing.
This OK for trunk?
Yes.
Thanks,
Richard.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-12-13 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_little_endian, arm_nothumb):
Documented existing target checks.
On 13/12/2019 13:05, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out Rainer. Thanks to that reminder I noticed there
is a different way to achieve this without adding that extra target check.
This OK?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-12-12 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian.
On 12/12/2019 17:41, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Andre,
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-12-12 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian.
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_target_arm_big_endian):
New target selector.
as always, this needs documenting in sourcebuild.texi.
Rainer
