Hi! The following patch optimizes decl %eax; cmpl $-1, %eax; jne .Lxx; into shorter and even possible to be fused: subl $1, %eax; jnc .Lxx;
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, during which this peephole2 triggered 7825 times, ok for trunk? 2019-12-19 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR target/93002 * config/i386/i386.md (dec reg; cmp $-1, reg; jne lab): New define_peephole2. * gcc.target/i386/pr93002.c: New test. --- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj 2019-12-17 21:39:26.686939030 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md 2019-12-19 13:31:52.424108730 +0100 @@ -6503,6 +6503,36 @@ (define_peephole2 [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (compare:CC (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1)))]) +;; decl %eax; cmpl $-1, %eax; jne .Lxx; can be optimized into +;; subl $1, %eax; jnc .Lxx; +(define_peephole2 + [(parallel + [(set (match_operand:SWI 0 "general_reg_operand") + (plus:SWI (match_dup 0) (const_int -1))) + (clobber (reg FLAGS_REG))]) + (set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG) + (compare:CCZ (match_dup 0) (const_int -1))) + (set (pc) + (if_then_else (match_operator 1 "bt_comparison_operator" + [(reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0)]) + (match_operand 2) + (pc)))] + "peep2_regno_dead_p (3, FLAGS_REG)" + [(parallel + [(set (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) + (compare:CC (match_dup 0) (const_int 1))) + (set (match_dup 0) + (minus:SWI (match_dup 0) (const_int 1)))]) + (set (pc) + (if_then_else (match_dup 3) + (match_dup 2) + (pc)))] +{ + rtx cc = gen_rtx_REG (CCmode, FLAGS_REG); + operands[3] = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (GET_CODE (operands[1]) == NE + ? GEU : LTU, VOIDmode, cc, const0_rtx); +}) + (define_insn "*subsi_3_zext" [(set (reg FLAGS_REG) (compare (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "0") --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93002.c.jj 2019-12-19 13:49:43.885341492 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr93002.c 2019-12-19 13:50:46.465361213 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +/* PR target/93002 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "cmp\[^\n\r]*-1" } } */ + +volatile int sink; + +void +foo (void) +{ + unsigned i = 1000; + while (i--) + sink = i; +} + +void +bar (void) +{ + int i = 2000; + while (i--) + sink = i; +} Jakub