Hi Jeff, >> I've noticed quite significant package failures caused by the revision. >> Would you please consider documenting this change in porting_to.html >> (and in changes.html) for GCC 10 release? > > I'm not in the office right now, but figured I'd chime in. I'd estimate > 400-500 packages are failing in Fedora because of this change. I'll > have a hard number Monday. > > It's significant enough that I'm not sure how we're going to get them > all fixed.
So what normally happens with the numerous new warnings/errors in GCC releases? I suppose that could cause package failures too. Would it be feasible to override the options for any failing packages? Cheers, Wilco
