Hi Jeff,

>> I've noticed quite significant package failures caused by the revision.
>> Would you please consider documenting this change in porting_to.html
>> (and in changes.html) for GCC 10 release?
>
> I'm not in the office right now, but figured I'd chime in.  I'd estimate
> 400-500 packages are failing in Fedora because of this change.  I'll
> have a hard number Monday.
>
> It's significant enough that I'm not sure how we're going to get them
> all fixed.

So what normally happens with the numerous new warnings/errors in GCC
releases? I suppose that could cause package failures too. Would it be feasible
to override the options for any failing packages?

Cheers,
Wilco

Reply via email to