On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, luoxhu wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/11/4 11:42, luoxhu wrote:
> > On 2019/11/2 00:23, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, Xiong Hu Luo wrote:
> >>
> >>> +@code{-finline} enables inlining of function declared \"inline\".
> >>> +@code{-finline} is enabled at levels -O1, -O2, -O3 and -Os, but not -Og.
> >>
> >> Use @option{} to mark up option names (both -finline and all the -O
> >> options in this paragraph). Use @code{} to mark up keyword names, not
> >> \"\".
> >>
> >
> > Thanks. So shall I commit the tiny patch with below updates?
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > index 1407d019d14..ea0d407fe11 100644
> > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > @@ -8576,6 +8576,10 @@ optimizing.
> > Single functions can be exempted from inlining by marking them
> > with the @code{noinline} attribute.
> >
> > +@option{-finline} enables inlining of function declared @code{inline}.
> > +@option{-finline} is enabled at levels @option{-O1}, @option{-O2},
> > @option{-O3}
> > +and @option{-Os}, but not @option{-Og}.
> > +
But this is wrong - -finline is enabled at -Og. I don't think the new
sentence adds anything useful.
> > @item -finline-small-functions
> > @opindex finline-small-functions
> > Integrate functions into their callers when their body is smaller than
> > expected
> >
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
