On 11/18/19 9:51 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> (Apologies to Jeff who's getting this twice because I didn't hit
> reply-all the first time.)
>
> On 11/17/19 6:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> While scanning this patch I did notice the introduction of
>> CC_STATUS_INIT in output_{and,ior,xor}si. You might want to check that.
>
> That is intentional. CC_STATUS_INIT can be used without cc0, and there's
> precedent in (IIRC) ARM. We need it to get final to tell us when it
> encounters a label - those don't make it to the postscan_insn hook.
OK. Just saw it and found it a bit odd. No worries if it was intentional.
jeff
