On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:39 AM Segher Boessenkool < seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:17:17PM +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > On Вт, ноя 12, 2019 at 14:08, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> > > wrote: > > >On Nov 12 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > >> I'm definitely missing something. Who are these users, and how can > > >>they > > >> make anything useful of these functions if they don't even pass an > > >> argument? > > > > > >By printing the desired value. > > > > Hah, okay. Well, in this case their workflow now gonna be 2 times > > simpler since they don't have to type in two commands, but only one :) > > Do we have to type parentheses now? That more than undoes that gain :-/ > > > Besides, I suspect, the number of actual users of this gdbinit is > > around zero, otherwise someone would have noticed the warning that gdb > > prints on every usage of these functions while the PATCH 1/2 is not > > applied. > > There are users. There are users who have been used to this behaviour > for many many many years. > > People just do (say I have an "rtx insn"): > p insn > pr > Indeed. I use this constantly. Jason
