Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

> Hi Jiu Fu,
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:40:41PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> gcc/
>> 2019-11-07  Jiufu Guo  <guoji...@linux.ibm.com>
>> 
>>      PR tree-optimization/88760
>>      * gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (-munroll-only-small-loops): New option.
>>      * gcc/common/config/rs6000/rs6000-common.c
>>      (rs6000_option_optimization_table) [OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS_SPEED_ONLY]:
>>      Turn on -funroll-loops and -munroll-only-small-loops.
>>      [OPT_LEVELS_ALL]: Turn off -fweb and -frename-registers.
>>      * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Remove
>>      set of PARAM_MAX_UNROLL_TIMES and PARAM_MAX_UNROLLED_INSNS.
>>      Turn off -munroll-only-small-loops for explicit -funroll-loops.
>>      (TARGET_LOOP_UNROLL_ADJUST): Add loop unroll adjust hook.
>>      (rs6000_loop_unroll_adjust): Define it.  Use -munroll-only-small-loops.
>> 
>> gcc.testsuite/
>> 2019-11-07  Jiufu Guo  <guoji...@linux.ibm.com>
>> 
>>      PR tree-optimization/88760
>>      * gcc.dg/pr59643.c: Update back to r277550.
>
> Okay for trunk.  Thanks!  Just some formatting stuff:
Thanks Segher! I will update according for patch.
>
>> +    /* Enable -munroll-only-small-loops with -funroll-loops to unroll small
>> +    loops at -O2 and above by default.   */
>
> The "l" of "loops" should align with the "E" of "Enable", and only two
> spaces after a dot:
>     /* Enable -munroll-only-small-loops with -funroll-loops to unroll small
>        loops at -O2 and above by default.  */
>
>> +/*  Implement targetm.loop_unroll_adjust.  */
>
> Only one space at the start of the comment.
>
>> +static unsigned
>> +rs6000_loop_unroll_adjust (unsigned nunroll, struct loop * loop)
>
> struct loop *loop
>
>> +      /* TODO: This is hardcoded to 10 right now.  It can be refined, for
>> +     example we may want to unroll very small loops more times (4 perhaps).
>> +     We also should use a PARAM for this.  */
>
> There will be target-specific params soon, if I understood correctly
> :-)
Yes, It is what I want to do.

Thanks again!

Jiufu
BR.

>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Segher

Reply via email to