Dear Tobias, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > This patches fixes my previous MOVE_ALLOC patch. The standard states for TO: > "It shall be polymorphic if FROM is polymorphic." > > I somehow read this bijectively, but the it is actually allowed to have a > nonpolymorphic FROM with a polymorphic TO. Thanks for Damian for finding > this. > > Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. > OK for the trunk?
Yes, of course this is OK. Thanks for fixing it so quickly Paul > > Tobias > > PS: Other pending patches: > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00249.html - Pointer INTENT(IN) > check for MOVE_ALLOC [4.6/4.7 rejects-valid regression] > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00250.html - no -fcheck=bounds > for character(LEN=:) to avoid ICE > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00253.html - (Re)enable warning > if a function result variable is not set [4.4-4.7 diagnostics regression] > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00254.html - Thomas' > dependency-ICE patch [4.6/4.7 regression] > - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00005.html - Fix component-access > check -- The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
