On 28 October 2019 23:08:10 CET, Richard Earnshaw <richard.earns...@foss.arm.com> wrote: >On 28/10/2019 21:52, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:53:06 +1100 >> Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 23:07, Richard Biener ><richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Did you try this with multiple assembler options? I see you stream >>>> them as -Wa,-mfpu=xyz,-mthumb but then compare the whole >>>> option strings so a mismatch with -Wa,-mthumb,-mfpu=xyz would be >> >> indeed, i'd have expected some kind of sorting, but i don't see it in >> the proposed patch? > >Why? If the options interact with each other, then sorting could >change >the meaning. We could only sort the options if we knew that couldn't
Right of course, retaining the given order is a must. Not sure what I was thinking. thanks,
