Bernd Schmidt <ber...@codesourcery.com> writes: > On 12/01/11 13:01, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: >> Sergio: Other than a few minor tweaks to the Changelog it largely >> looks obvious to me. >> >> Bernd, could you take another look at this since this is now shared >> with the c6x backend ? > > Doesn't look like it would cause problems. I have no idea what > builtin_frob_return_addr does but it appears to exist everywhere.
Thanks for the reviews. I guess I'll leave the call to builtin_frob_return_addr there. So, after addressing Ramana's suggestions to ChangeLog, is this patch OK to go in? Thanks.
