Hi,
This piece of code was pre-approved by richi.
Retested by bootstrapping and regression testing on x86_64 (AVX512) and
aarch64.
Committed in revision r277105.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-10-17 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_2): Use same condition to
decide
when to use versioning threshold.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
index b00d68b9de938148c24e088024b2e01bdceb2e81..72b80f46b1a9fa0bc8392809c286b5fac9a74451 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
@@ -2155,6 +2155,7 @@ start_over:
if (LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING (loop_vinfo))
{
poly_uint64 niters_th = 0;
+ unsigned int th = LOOP_VINFO_COST_MODEL_THRESHOLD (loop_vinfo);
if (!vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo))
{
@@ -2175,6 +2176,14 @@ start_over:
/* One additional iteration because of peeling for gap. */
if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo))
niters_th += 1;
+
+ /* Use the same condition as vect_transform_loop to decide when to use
+ the cost to determine a versioning threshold. */
+ if (th >= vect_vf_for_cost (loop_vinfo)
+ && !LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
+ && ordered_p (th, niters_th))
+ niters_th = ordered_max (poly_uint64 (th), niters_th);
+
LOOP_VINFO_VERSIONING_THRESHOLD (loop_vinfo) = niters_th;
}