On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 19:34 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > So probably the most interesting target for this test is v850-elf as > it's got a reasonably well functioning simulator, hard and soft FP > targets, little endian, and I'm familiar with its current set of > failures. > > I can confirm that your patch makes no difference in the test results > (which includes execution results). > > In fact, there haven't been any problems on any target in my tester > that > I can tie back to this change. > > At this point I'd say let's go for it. >
Thanks, Jeff. I'll commit it to trunk if there are no further objections some time next week. It's a latent issue, not a regression. OK for the open branches, too? Any opinions on that? Cheers, Oleg
