On 10/10/19, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > While I agree that this is quite cool to have, the following: > >> + /* DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL should be supplied via -D by the Makefile >> + (see --with-documentation-root-url). >> + >> + Expect an anchor of the form "index-Wfoo" e.g. >> + <a name="index-Wformat"></a>, and thus an id within >> + the URL of "#index-Wformat". */ >> + return concat (DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL, >> + "Warning-Options.html", >> + "#index", cl_options[option_index].opt_text, >> + NULL); > > will not work for many -W options: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options > (scroll to the bottom) > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Objective-C-and-Objective-C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#Objective-C-and-Objective-C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options > (scroll to the bottom) > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/cpp/Invocation.html#index-Wcomment > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gfortran/Error-and-Warning-Options.html#Error-and-Warning-Options > > I would argue that some options are documented in the wrong place (I think all > C/C++ -W options should just go to Warning-Options.html),
That's bug 71283, for reference: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283 > but I also believe the HTML page should be language dependent. > > Cheers, > > Manuel. > >
