On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:56:48PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:29:11AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > @@ -8651,6 +8675,11 @@ rs6000_legitimate_address_p (machine_mod > > && mode_supports_pre_incdec_p (mode) > > && legitimate_indirect_address_p (XEXP (x, 0), reg_ok_strict)) > > return 1; > > + > > + /* Handle prefixed addresses (PC-relative or 34-bit offset). */ > > + if (address_is_prefixed (x, mode, NON_PREFIXED_DEFAULT)) > > + return 1; > > Is this correct? Are addresses with a larger offset always legitimate? > I don't see why that would be the case. > > The rest of the patch looks good, thanks.
This patch BTW is the same as the new V5 patch #1. -- Michael Meissner, IBM IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
