Hi Christophe, Thanks for flagging this up - I am back at base on Saturday and will take it up then.
Regards Paul On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:13, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 20:31, Paul Richard Thomas > <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I must apologise not posting this before committing. I left for a >> vacation this morning and I thought that this problem and the one >> posted by Gilles were best fixed before departing. The patch only >> touches the new ISO_Fortran binding feature and so I thought that I >> would be safe to do this. >> >> It was fully regtested and only applies to trunk. >> >> Paul >> >> Author: pault >> Date: Sat Oct 5 08:17:55 2019 >> New Revision: 276624 >> >> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276624&root=gcc&view=rev >> Log: >> 2019-10-05 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/91926 >> * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc): Correct the >> assignment of the attribute field to account correctly for an >> assumed shape dummy. Assign separately to the gfc and cfi >> descriptors since the atribute can be different. Add btanch to >> correctly handle missing optional dummies. >> >> 2019-10-05 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/91926 >> * gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_13.f90 : New test. >> * gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_13.c : Additional source. >> * gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_14.f90 : New test. >> >> 2019-10-05 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/91926 >> * runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c (cfi_desc_to_gfc_desc): Do not >> modify the bounds and offset for CFI_other. >> >> Added: >> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_13.c >> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_13.f90 >> trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_14.f90 >> Modified: >> trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog >> trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c >> trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >> trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog >> trunk/libgfortran/runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c > > > > Since this was committed (r276624), I have noticed regressions on > arm-linux-gnueabihf: > FAIL: gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_11.f90 -O3 -g execution test > I've seen other reports on gcc-testresults too. > > Christophe > -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
