Hi Paul,
that message was a copy/paste leftover. It doesn't make any sense in
that part of the code, it's now removed.

Committed as revision 276164.

Thanks!


Il giorno dom 15 set 2019 alle ore 12:19 Paul Richard Thomas
<paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi Sandro,
>
> This patch looks fine to me. I have a question about the comment:
> "This code is obviously added because the finalizer is not trusted to
> free all memory."
> 'obviously'? Not to me :-( Maybe you can expand on this?
>
> As to the stat and errmsg: Leave them for the time being. However, an
> attempt will have to be made to implement F2018 "16.6 Collective
> subroutines". I don't know enough about the coarrays implementation to
> be able to help you about detecting these conditions. Maybe Tobias
> Burnus can help?
>
> OK to commit.
>
> Paul
>
> PS Sometime before very long, something will have to be done about the
> exponential code bloat that structure_alloc_comps. The more users that
> there are for it the tougher it is going to get!
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 18:41, Alessandro Fanfarillo
> <fanfarillo....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > please find in attachment a preliminary patch that adds support to
> > co_broadcast for allocatable components of derived types.
> > The patch is currently ignoring the stat and errmsg arguments, mostly
> > because I am not sure how to handle them properly. I have created a
> > new data structure called used to pass those argument to the
> > preexisting structure_alloc_comps.
> > Suggestions on how to handle them are more than welcome :-)
> >
> > The patch builds correctly on x86_64 and it has been tested with
> > OpenCoarrays and the following test cases:
> >
> > https://github.com/sourceryinstitute/OpenCoarrays/blob/co_broadcast-derived-type/src/tests/unit/collectives/co_broadcast_allocatable_components.f90
> >
> > https://github.com/sourceryinstitute/OpenCoarrays/blob/co_broadcast-derived-type/src/tests/unit/collectives/co_broadcast_allocatable_components_array.f90
> >
> > Regards,
>
>
>
> --
> "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
> - Albert Einstein

Reply via email to