On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > Hi, > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass > > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there > > ? > > Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that > > will clean up the dead store ? > I'd hesitate to add another DSE pass. If there's one nearby could we > move the existing pass? Well I think the nearest one is just after pass_warn_restrict. Not sure if it's a good idea to move it up from there ?
Thanks, Prathamesh > > > Jeff
