Hello Iain & Rainer, Thanks for the heads up and sorry for the disruption from this one.
> On 19 Sep 2019, at 17:02, Iain Sandoe <idsan...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Given that the test cannot compile on anything but *-*-linux* and >> *-*-mingw*, I'd rather restrict the test to those two (or more targets >> that decide to implement the missing interface). > > that makes sense, too (targets with support can opt in) Works for me as well. The point of the test is really to check a 32/64 discrepancy initially observed on Windows. It is not meant as a general representative test of the System.Task_Info feature. If you get it to work on Darwin or Solaris and wish to opt-in afterwards, this is also fine of course :) We can take care of adding the required filter. Cheers, Olivier
