On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 01:26:27PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: [snip]
> So to keep other passes from 'improving' things, I opted to do the pass as the > last pass before final. If the problem is that you do not properly analyse dependencies between insns, well, fix that? If this really needs to be done after everything else GCC does, that is problematic. What when you have two or more passes with that property? If this really needs to be done after everything else GCC does, does it belong in the compiler at all? Should the assembler do it instead, or the linker? Segher
