From: Shahab Vahedi <sha...@synopsys.com> This change makes sure that if the driver is invoked with "-mcode-density" flag, then the assembler will receive it too.
gcc/ 2019-09-03 Sahahb Vahedi <sha...@synopsys.com> * config/arc/arc.h (ASM_SPEC): pass -mcode-density * gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Shahab Vahedi <sha...@synopsys.com> --- gcc/config/arc/arc.h | 5 +-- .../gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c diff --git a/gcc/config/arc/arc.h b/gcc/config/arc/arc.h index 8dca0d2c4b2..05fba539295 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arc/arc.h +++ b/gcc/config/arc/arc.h @@ -96,8 +96,9 @@ extern const char *arc_cpu_to_as (int argc, const char **argv); #endif #undef ASM_SPEC -#define ASM_SPEC "%{mbig-endian|EB:-EB} %{EL} " \ - "%:cpu_to_as(%{mcpu=*:%*}) %{mspfp*} %{mdpfp*} %{mfpu=fpuda*:-mfpuda}" +#define ASM_SPEC "%{mbig-endian|EB:-EB} %{EL} " \ + "%:cpu_to_as(%{mcpu=*:%*}) %{mspfp*} %{mdpfp*} " \ + "%{mfpu=fpuda*:-mfpuda} %{mcode-density}" #define OPTION_DEFAULT_SPECS \ {"cpu", "%{!mcpu=*:%{!mARC*:%{!marc*:%{!mA7:%{!mA6:-mcpu=%(VALUE)}}}}}" } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ecf1a2ca29 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arc/code-density-flag.c @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +/* Produce code-dense instructions and the assembler must * + * be okay with it. An example would be: * + * * + * sub_s r3, r1, r3 * + * * + * While generally for _short instructions_ , it is not * + * allowed to have different registers as the first and * + * second operands, the code-dense mode allows it. * + * This test is about the fact that if "-mcode-density" is * + * passed to gcc driver as the flag, "as" must receive it * + * as well, else it is going to choke on such encodings. */ + +/* { dg-do assemble } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { clmcpu } } } */ +/* { dg-options "-mcpu=em_mini -mcode-density" } */ + +typedef long long uint64_t; + +uint64_t f1(void) +{ + return 1; +} + +void f2(void) +{ + uint64_t start_us = 0; + while ((f1() - start_us) < 2); +} + +/* This is a tricky check, because it hardcodes register * + * numbers. Nevertheless, it is easier than coming up with * + * a regular expression that the first two operands should * + * not be the same. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "sub_s\\s+r3,r1,r3" } } */ -- 2.23.0