On 8/15/19 9:46 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > as discussed in the PR 91109 audit trail, > my previous patch missed a case where no spilling is necessary, > but the re-materialized instruction has now scratch regs without > a hard register assignment. And thus the LRA pass falls out of > the loop pre-maturely. > > Fixed by checking for scratch regs with no assignment > and continuing the loop in that case. > > > Boot-strapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf. > Is it OK for trunk? >
Aehm, sorry, I forgot to ask, but is it also OK for the gcc-9 branch ? Thanks Bernd.
