2011/11/24 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>:
> Hello!
>
>> Here is a short patch to fix PR target/51287. Patch avoids
>> get_attr_type call for instructions which cannot be recognized.
>>
>> 2011-11-24  Enkovich Ilya  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>
>>
>>       PR target/51287
>>       * i386.c (distance_non_agu_define_in_bb): Fix insn attr check.
>
> This is OK for mainline and release branches.
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
>

Thanks for the review!

Here is corresponding patch for 4.6 branch. Bootstrapped and checked
on linux-x86_64.

Thanks,
Ilya
---
2011-11-24  Enkovich Ilya  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>

        PR target/51287
        * i386.c (distance_non_agu_define): Fix insn attr check.


diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 382fabf..6aa0297 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -16329,7 +16329,6 @@ distance_non_agu_define (unsigned int regno1,
unsigned int regno2,
   basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
   int distance = 0;
   df_ref *def_rec;
-  enum attr_type insn_type;

   if (insn != BB_HEAD (bb))
     {
@@ -16345,8 +16344,8 @@ distance_non_agu_define (unsigned int regno1,
unsigned int regno2,
                     && (regno1 == DF_REF_REGNO (*def_rec)
                        || regno2 == DF_REF_REGNO (*def_rec)))
                  {
-                   insn_type = get_attr_type (prev);
-                   if (insn_type != TYPE_LEA)
+                   if (recog_memoized (prev) < 0
+                       || get_attr_type (prev) != TYPE_LEA)
                      goto done;
                  }
            }
@@ -16385,8 +16384,8 @@ distance_non_agu_define (unsigned int regno1,
unsigned int regno2,
                        && (regno1 == DF_REF_REGNO (*def_rec)
                            || regno2 == DF_REF_REGNO (*def_rec)))
                      {
-                       insn_type = get_attr_type (prev);
-                       if (insn_type != TYPE_LEA)
+                       if (recog_memoized (prev) < 0
+                           || get_attr_type (prev) != TYPE_LEA)
                          goto done;
                      }
                }

Reply via email to