On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > dimode_{scalar_to_vector_candidate_p,remove_non_convertible_regs}
> > functions to drop the dimode_ prefix - is that OK or do you
> > prefer some other prefix?
>
> No, please just drop the prefix.
just noticed this applies to the derived dimode_scalar_chain class
as well where I can't simply drop the prefix. So would
general_scalar_chain /
general_{scalar_to_vector_candidate_p,remove_non_convertible_regs}
be OK?
Richard.
