Ping.

Steve Ellcey
sell...@marvell.com

On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 11:25 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 19:24 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > 
> > You can probably also remove:
> > 
> >       tree new_type = build_distinct_type_copy (TREE_TYPE (node-
> > >decl));
> >       ...
> >       TREE_TYPE (node->decl) = new_type;
> > 
> > in simd_clone_adjust_argument_types.
> > 
> > I'm happy doing it this way or doing the copy in the AArch64 hook.
> > It's really Jakub's call.
> 
> You are right, that is no longer needed with the current patch.  I
> removed it and retested with no regressions.  Jakub, do you have
> any preference?  I have attached a new version of the patch to this
> email.
> 
> > I don't think the tests need:
> > 
> > /* { dg-require-effective-target aarch64_variant_pcs } */
> > 
> > since they're only dg-do compile.  Leaving the line out would get
> > more
> > coverage for people using older binutils.
> > 
> > The tests are OK with that change, thanks.
> 
> OK, I made that change to the tests.
> 
> 
> Latest version of the patch:
> 
> 2019-07-22  Steve Ellcey  <sell...@marvell.com>
> 
>       * omp-simd-clone.c (simd_clone_adjust_return_type): Remove call
> to
>       build_distinct_type_copy.
>       (simd_clone_adjust_argument_types): Ditto.
>       (simd_clone_adjust): Call build_distinct_type_copy here.
>       (expand_simd_clones): Ditto.
> 
> 
> 2019-07-22  Steve Ellcey  <sell...@marvell.com>
> 
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/simd_pcs_attribute.c: New test.
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/simd_pcs_attribute-2.c: Ditto.
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/simd_pcs_attribute-3.c: Ditto.
> 
> 

Reply via email to