inchash::hash::add_wide_int operated directly on the raw encoding
of the wide_int, including any redundant upper bits.  The problem
with that is that the upper bits are only defined for some wide-int
storage types (including wide_int itself).  wi::to_wide(tree) instead
returns a value that is extended according to the signedness of the
type (so that wi::to_widest can use the same encoding) while rtxes
have the awkward special case of BI, which can be zero-extended
rather than sign-extended.

In the PR, we computed a hash for a "normal" sign-extended wide_int
while the existing entries hashed wi::to_wide(tree).  This gives
different results for unsigned types that have the top bit set.

The patch fixes that by hashing the canonical sign-extended form even
if the raw encoding happens to be different.

Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu (with and without SVE), armeb-eabi
and x86_64-linux-gnu.  OK to install?

Richard


2019-07-29  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@arm.com>

gcc/
        * wide-int.h (generic_wide_int::sext_elt): New function.
        * inchash.h (hash::add_wide_int): Use it instead of elt.

Index: gcc/wide-int.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/wide-int.h      2019-07-10 19:41:26.391898059 +0100
+++ gcc/wide-int.h      2019-07-29 10:08:12.048610030 +0100
@@ -730,6 +730,7 @@ class GTY(()) generic_wide_int : public
   /* Public accessors for the interior of a wide int.  */
   HOST_WIDE_INT sign_mask () const;
   HOST_WIDE_INT elt (unsigned int) const;
+  HOST_WIDE_INT sext_elt (unsigned int) const;
   unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ulow () const;
   unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT uhigh () const;
   HOST_WIDE_INT slow () const;
@@ -909,6 +910,23 @@ generic_wide_int <storage>::elt (unsigne
     return this->get_val ()[i];
 }
 
+/* Like elt, but sign-extend beyond the upper bit, instead of returning
+   the raw encoding.  */
+template <typename storage>
+inline HOST_WIDE_INT
+generic_wide_int <storage>::sext_elt (unsigned int i) const
+{
+  HOST_WIDE_INT elt_i = elt (i);
+  if (!is_sign_extended)
+    {
+      unsigned int precision = this->get_precision ();
+      unsigned int lsb = i * HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT;
+      if (precision - lsb < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
+       elt_i = sext_hwi (elt_i, precision - lsb);
+    }
+  return elt_i;
+}
+
 template <typename storage>
 template <typename T>
 inline generic_wide_int <storage> &
Index: gcc/inchash.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/inchash.h       2019-03-08 18:15:36.704740334 +0000
+++ gcc/inchash.h       2019-07-29 10:08:12.048610030 +0100
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ hashval_t iterative_hash_hashval_t (hash
   {
     add_int (x.get_len ());
     for (unsigned i = 0; i < x.get_len (); i++)
-      add_hwi (x.elt (i));
+      add_hwi (x.sext_elt (i));
   }
 
   /* Hash in pointer PTR.  */

Reply via email to