On 11/21/2011 01:39 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > It still fails when combined > with transaction expressions (noexcept-4.C and noexcept-1.C) because > gimplify_must_not_throw_expr() calls voidify_wrapper_expr() on a > MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR which it doesn't know to be a wrapper. What's the > cleanest way to solve that? Adding handling of MUST_NOT_THROW_EXPR > inside voidify_... will include C++ stuff there, right? Or should there > be a C++ version of voidify_...? Or something else?
What's happening below gimplify_must_not_throw_expr? That *ought* to be recursing into voidify_wrapper_expr and doing the right thing. r~
