On 11/21/2011 02:04 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > The reason it was in libgcc_eh (AFAIK, the original implementation > pre-dates my GCC days) - is because there can only be one copy of the > static emutls locking entities in a given exe. I guess it was felt > analogous to the "only one unwinder" rule.
Yes, that was it. That puts the stuff in libgcc_s.so, but not libgcc.a. r~
