On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 08:02:16AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:51:54AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > +#undef TARGET_INSN_ALIGNMENT > > +#define TARGET_INSN_ALIGNMENT 16 > > There already is FUNCTION_BOUNDARY for something similar, which fits in > well with STACK_BOUNDARY, PARM_BOUNDARY, many more *_BOUNDARY. I realise > you may prefer a hook, but as long as we aren't getting rid of all the > other macros, what's the point?
And maybe LABEL_BOUNDARY is bettter for this than INSN_BOUNDARY as well? Segher
